Analisis Hamartiologi Reformed terhadap Polarisasi dan Intoleransi Agama di Media Sosial
Kata Kunci:
Hamartiologi, Intoleransi, Media Sosial, Polarisasi, Ruang SiberAbstrak
The phenomenon of religious polarization and intolerance on social media, which triggers cyber-social division, underlies the critique against the illusion of a healthy digital public sphere. This study aims to analyze the theological implications of such cyber-space deterioration through the lens of Christian hamartiology (the doctrine of sin), specifically focusing on the expression of structural sin and the automated transmission of hatred. Employing an interdisciplinary qualitative method with a critical correlation approach, this study connects the technical mechanisms of engagement-based social media algorithms with the principles of systematic theology regarding the depravity of human nature. The findings indicate that intolerance on social media is a mechanical amplification of human moral flaws institutionalized digitally. Although algorithmic architecture lacks moral consciousness, these cyber systems function as instruments that alienate fellow creations and perpetuate systemic discord. This study concludes that the integration of hamartiology significantly contributes to formulating a prophetic digital ethics while providing a dogmatic foundation for the critical evaluation of interreligious relations in the digital era.
Fenomena polarisasi dan intoleransi agama di media sosial yang memicu pembelahan sosial siber mendasari kritik terhadap ilusi ruang publik digital yang sehat. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis implikasi teologis dari kerusakan ruang siber tersebut melalui kacamata hamartiologi Kristen (doktrin dosa), dengan fokus pada ekspresi dosa struktural dan transmisi kebencian yang terotomatisasi. Metode yang digunakan adalah kualitatif interdisipliner dengan pendekatan korelasi kritis, yang menghubungkan mekanisme teknis algoritma rekomendasi media sosial (engagement-based ranking) dengan prinsip teologi sistematika mengenai kerusakan natur manusia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa intoleransi di media sosial merupakan bentuk amplifikasi mekanis dari cacat moral manusia yang terlembaga secara digital. Meskipun arsitektur algoritma tidak memiliki kesadaran moral, sistem siber berfungsi sebagai instrumen yang mengasingkan sesama ciptaan dan melanggengkan perselisihan secara sistemik. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa integrasi hamartiologi berkontribusi penting dalam merumuskan etika digital profetik sekaligus memberikan landasan dogmatis bagi evaluasi kritis terhadap pola relasi agama di era digital.
Unduhan
Referensi
Ayling, Jacqui, and Adriane Chapman. “Putting AI Ethics to Work: Are the Tools Fit for Purpose?” AI and Ethics 2, no. 3 (2022): 405–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00084-x.
Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics Study Edition 17: The Doctrine of Creation III. 3 § 48-49. Vol. 17. A&C Black, 2010.
Bavinck, Herman. Reformed Dogmatics: Sin and Salvation in Christ. Baker Academic, 2006.
Benjamin, Ruha. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Polity Press, 2019.
Broussard, Meredith. Artificial Unintelligence: How Computers Misunderstand the World. MIT Press, 2018.
Callais, Victoria. “Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age.” Journal of College Orientation, Transition, and Retention 27 (December 2020). https://doi.org/10.24926/jcotr.v27i2.3099.
Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Litres, 2021.
Candra, Theo Pilus. “Optimalisasi Media Digital Renungan.My.Id Sebagai Sarana Penginjilan Mandiri Di Era Digital.” Articles. Journal of Digital Innovation and Social Research 5, no. 1 (2026). https://journal.ptmpd.com/index.php/jdisr/article/view/28.
Candra, Theo Pilus, Eiodia Eveline Permata Sari, Demas Arendra, and Felixtian Teknowijoyo. “BIAS ALGORITMIK DAN DOSA STRUKTURAL: ANALISIS HAMARTIOLOGI REFORMED TERHADAP MACHINE LEARNING.” Articles. Jurnal Penggerak 8, no. 1 (2026): 38–60. https://doi.org/10.62042/itp.v8i38.
Candra, Theo Pilus, and Eiodia Eveline Permata Sari. “Homiletika di Era TikTok dalam Menjaga Otoritas Mimbar di Tengah Durasi Atensi 60 Detik.” Articles. Journal of Digital Innovation and Social Research 2, no. 2 (2023). https://journal.ptmpd.com/index.php/jdisr/article/view/10.
Candra, Theo Pilus, and Eiodia Eveline Permata Sari. “Pendekatan Apologetika Dialogis dalam Mengkomunikasikan Injil di Tengah Masyarakat Majemuk.” Articles. Journal of Digital Innovation and Social Research 3, no. 1 (2024). https://journal.ptmpd.com/index.php/jdisr/article/view/13.
Coeckelbergh, Mark. AI Ethics. MIT Press, 2020.
Dods, Marcus. The City of God. Hendrickson Publishers, 2022.
Hoekema, Anthony A. Manusia: Ciptaan Menurut Gambar Allah. Momentum, 2013.
Ihde, Don. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Indiana University Press, 1990.
Klaiber, Judith. “Theological Anthropology Facing Artificial Intelligence. The Investigation of an Intersection Based on Treatises.” Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society (Leiden, The Netherlands), 2024, 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30965/23642807-bja10094.
Ndruru, Terifosa, and Agustinus Setiawidi. “Teologi Artificial Intelligence: Suatu Kajian Etis-Teologis Terhadap Fenomena Kehadiran Pendeta AI Dalam Konteks Gereja Di Indonesia Di Masa Depan.” DUNAMIS: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Kristiani 9, no. 2 (2024): 607–28. https://doi.org/10.30648/dun.v9i2.1425.
Niebuhr, Reinhold. Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics. Westminster John Knox Press, 2013.
O’Neil, Cathy. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown, 2016.
Pakpahan, Binsar Jonathan. “Berteologi Dari Hati: Cara Teologi Menyikapi Perkembangan Artificial Intelligence.” STFT Jakarta, 2023.
Pasquale, Frank. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press, 2015.
Prianto, Robi, Kezia Lawira, and Julberkat Patodo. “Pengetahuan, Teknologi, Dan Kehidupan Manusia Dalam Perspektif Teologis.” Te Deum (Jurnal Teologi Dan Pengembangan Pelayanan) 13, no. 2 SE-Articles (2024). https://doi.org/10.51828/td.v13i2.390.
Sari, Eiodia Eveline Permata, and Theo Pilus Candra. “Menara Babel dan ‘Big Data’ Sebuah Tafsir Naratologis Kejadian 11:1-9 Terhadap Ambisi Teknologi Global.” Journal of Digital Innovation and Social Research 2, no. 1 SE-Articles (n.d.). https://journal.ptmpd.com/index.php/jdisr/article/view/9.
Tegmark, Max. Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Knopf, 2017.
Tillich, Paul. Systematic Theology: Life and the Spirit History and the Kingdom of God. University of Chicago Press, 2011.
Turkle, S. Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. Penguin Publishing Group, 2015. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=POpJBgAAQBAJ.
Zuboff, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. PublicAffairs, 2019.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Theo Pilus Candra (Penulis)

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


